Skip to main content

Table 5 Standardized regression coefficients and fit indices of the models

From: Context matters! The relationship between mother-reported family nutrition climate, general parenting, food parenting practices and children’s BMI

 

Path

 

Fit indizes

1

2

3

β (95 % CI)

β (95 % CI)

r (95 % CI)

R2

χ2, df, p

χ2/df

SRMR

CFI

RMSEA, (95 % CI), p

Model A Healthy FPPs

.183 (.022–.353)

.498 (.323–.684)

.490 (.316–.632)

.37

98.923, 60, .001

1.649

.045

.967

.049, (.031, .066), .506

Model B Covert FPPs

−.190 (−.415–.028)

.686 (.486–.898)

.507 (.350–.640)

.37

125.913, 41, .000

3.071

.075

.878

.088, (.071, .106), .000

Model C Overt FPPs

.389 (.199–.601)

.130 (−.079–.308)

.489 (.289–.639)

.22

46.957, 24, .004

1.915

.052

.960

.059, (.032, .084), .269

Model D Non-nutritive FPPs

.010 (−.218–.261)

−.321 (−.583 – −.113)

.488 (.292–.639)

.10

56.471, 24, .000

2.353

.060

.934

.071, (.047, .096), .071

  1. FPPs food parenting practices; Bold numbers are statistically significant (P < .05)
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us