Skip to main content

Table 5 Prevalence ratios. Prevalence ratios based on multiple regression models for associations between recovery opportunities at work and excellent work ability for young men

From: Opportunities for recovery at work and excellent work ability - a cross-sectional population study among young workers

 

Men

Men with high work demands

 

N = 1025

N = 345

 

Multiple model Ia

Multiple model IIb

Multiple model IIIc

Multiple model IVd

Recovery opportunities at work

PR

(95 % CI)

PR

(95 % CI)

PR

(95 % CI)

PR

(95 % CI)

Possibility of deciding working hours

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Possibility of deciding the work pace

1.1

(0.96–1.29)

1.1

(0.96–1.29)

1.2

(0.90–1.49)

1.1e

(0.85–1.42)

Possibility of taking short breaks

1.1

(0.95–1.26)

1.1e

(0.93–1.24)

.

.

.

.

Possibility of deciding when to perform a work task

1.1

(0.97–1.30)

1.1

(0.96–1.29)

1.2

(0.93–1.52)

1.3

(0.96–1.60)

Having mostly varied work

1.3

(1.10–1.46)

1.3

(1.10–1.45)

1.3

(0.99–1.61)

1.3

(1.01–1.67)

  1. aMultiple model with no confounders. bMultiple model with two confounders: high work demands and educational level. cMultiple model for the subsample with no confounders. dMultiple model for the subsample with one confounder: educational level. eVariable included only to adjust the multiple model. (N number of workers included in the multiple analyses, PR prevalence ratios, 95 % CI = 95 % confidence interval, . = the variable was not included in the multiple model)