Skip to main content

Table 4 Prevalence ratios. Prevalence ratios based on multiple regression models for associations between recovery opportunities at work and excellent work ability for young women

From: Opportunities for recovery at work and excellent work ability - a cross-sectional population study among young workers

 

Women

Women with high work demands

 

N = 1279

N = 434

 

Multiple model Ia

Multiple model IIb

Multiple model IIIc

Multiple model IVd

Recovery opportunities at work

PR

(95 % CI)

PR

(95 % CI)

PR

(95 % CI)

PR

(95 % CI)

Possibility of deciding working hours

1.1

(0.98–1.24)

1.1

(0.96–1.22)

1.2

(0.94–1.41)

1.2

(0.98–1.46)

Possibility of deciding the work pace

1.1e

(0.94–1.20)

1.0e

(0.92–1.17)

1.2

(0.89–1.42)

.

.

Possibility of taking short breaks

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Possibility of deciding when to perform a work task

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Having mostly varied work

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

  1. aMultiple model with no confounders. bMultiple model with two confounders: high work demands and educational level. cMultiple model for the subsample with no confounders. dMultiple model for the subsample with one confounder: educational level. eVariable included only to adjust the multiple model
  2. (N number of workers included in the multiple analyses, PR prevalence ratios, 95 % CI = 95 % confidence interval, . = the variable was not included in the multiple model)