This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Young people’s perceptions of smartphone-enabled self-testing and online care for sexually transmitted infections: qualitative interview study
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 1 October 2015
Accepted: 7 September 2016
Published: 13 September 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - D Santamaria|
|24 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kathleen Tebb|
|4 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rodney Knight|
|11 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Aicken|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Aicken|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Sep 2016||Editorially accepted|
|13 Sep 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12889-016-3648-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.