Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Public Health

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Examining health literacy disparities in the United States: a third look at the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL)

BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:975

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3621-9

Received: 10 March 2016

Accepted: 2 September 2016

Published: 13 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
2 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
13 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12889-016-3621-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Media & Information, Michigan State University
(2)
Department of Sociology & Anthropology, North Carolina State University
(3)
McKinney Health Literacy Services
(4)
Deakin Population Health SRC, Faculty of Health, Deakin University

Advertisement