Skip to main content

Table 3 Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression predicting likelihood of women in Aleta Wondo, Ethiopia reporting daily occurrence of smoking/SHS in the home [n = 338]

From: Factors associated with secondhand tobacco smoke in the home: an exploratory cross-sectional study among women in Aleta Wondo, Ethiopia

 

Unadjusted OR [95 % CI]a

p value

Adjusted OR [95 % CI]b

p value

Maternal agec

1.04 [0.99, 1.08]

.09

1.01 [0.96, 1.07]

.65

Household Decision-makingd

1.26 [0.96, 1.65]

.09

0.91 [0.64, 1.28]

.57

Place of residence (urbanicity)e

4.58 [2.26, 9.29]

<.001

2.74 [1.11, 6.74]

.03

Ethnicity [tribal association] f

3.56 [1.92, 6.60]

<.001

1.44 [0.59, 3.49]

.42

Member of household is a current user of tobacco products

12.28 [6.13, 24.58]

<.001

9.91 [3.32, 29.59]

<.001

Member of household involved in growing, manufacturing or selling of tobacco products

12.28 [5.27, 28.61]

.10

2.67 [0.81, 8.79]

.11

Smoking allowed in home (No home smoking ban)g

2.57 [0.95–6.98]

<.001

5.67 [2.51, 12.79]

<.001

Exposure to point-of-sale tobacco advertising, within last 30 daysh

2.02 [1.10, 3.72]

.03

2.87 [1.26, 6.54]

.01

Ever use khat h

2.04 [0.90, 4.61]

.09

1.14 [0.41, 3.15]

.80

  1. aSignificance p < .10
  2. bSignificance p < .05
  3. cContinuous variable (years). Six ‘Don’t know’ responses were excluded
  4. dContinuous variable (composite HDM score)
  5. eReference category: Residing in a rural district (versus urban)
  6. fReference category: Sidama (versus non-Sidama)
  7. gReference category: Smoking never allowed in home (versus ‘Allowed’ and ‘Not allowed, but exceptions’)
  8. hReference category: No