What is the impact of flexicurity on the chances of entry into employment for people with low education and activity limitations due to health problems? A comparison of 21 European countries using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)

Table 3 Calibration of conditions and outcomes

	Range	Thresholds corresponding to fully in – neither in nor out - fully out
Outcomes
High rate ratio (RR)	0.38–0.99	0.8-0.66-0.5
High RTW (%)	4–33	35.0-13-9.0
Conditions
High Employment (%)	61.7–79.0	75.0-71.0-63.0
Low Unemployment (%)	2.8–12.4	5.0-7-9.0
Low EPL (score 0–6)	0.74–3.27	1.0-2.0-3.5
Low EPT (score 0–6)	0.25–3.83	0.75-1.4-3.5
High PES^a	0.00–0.11	0.06-0.02-0.007
High ALMP^a	0.01–0.30	0.25-0.07-0.02
High ALMPtot (summary score)	0.01–0.37	0.3-0.07-0.02
High PLMP^a	0.01–0.46	0.25-0.10-0.02
High Sickben^b	0.02–0.24	0.1-0.06-0.035
High ExpChild^c	0–0.38	0.2-0.1-0.05
High ExpOld^d	0–0.14	0.1-0.03-0.01
High SocExp (summary score)	0.00–0.50	0.3-0.135-0.1
High LLL (%)	2.9–29.9	20-9-5

^aExpenditure as a percentage of GDP per percentage unemployed. ^bExpenditure as a percentage of GDP per percentage with activity limitations in the age group 45–64 years. ^cExpenditure on child care as a percentage of GDP per percentage 0–4 years. ^dExpenditure on elder care as a percentage of GDP per percentage 65 and above

ISSN: 1471-2458