Skip to main content

Table 2 The relative importances of each environmental factor for the total sample and within each subgroup

From: Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis

 

Total sample (n = 1950)a

Group 1 (n = 232)a

Group 2 (n = 598)a

Group 3 (n = 1120)a

Type of cycle path

58.47 ± 16.96

42.67 ± 5.12

39.44 ± 9.94

71.90 ± 4.10

Speed limit

8.29 ± 7.11

25.73 ± 3.95

4.10 ± 2.91

6.91 ± 2.45

Evenness of the cycle path

8.23 ± 5.96

7.50 ± 3.47

14.05 ± 7.22

5.27 ± 2.11

Traffic density

7.41 ± 7.45

7.47 ± 4.24

14.93 ± 9.01

3.38 ± 1.75

Vegetation

7.44 ± 5.31

7.33 ± 2.63

10.70 ± 7.72

5.72 ± 2.69

Maintenance

7.37 ± 6.20

5.12 ± 2.92

13.69 ± 7.30

4.46 ± 2.44

Speedbump

2.79 ± 2.23

4.17 ± 3.05

3.09 ± 2.41

2.35 ± 1.73

  1. aAverage relative importances % (M + SD)