Skip to main content

Table 2 The relative importances of each environmental factor for the total sample and within each subgroup

From: Differences in environmental preferences towards cycling for transport among adults: a latent class analysis

  Total sample (n = 1950)a Group 1 (n = 232)a Group 2 (n = 598)a Group 3 (n = 1120)a
Type of cycle path 58.47 ± 16.96 42.67 ± 5.12 39.44 ± 9.94 71.90 ± 4.10
Speed limit 8.29 ± 7.11 25.73 ± 3.95 4.10 ± 2.91 6.91 ± 2.45
Evenness of the cycle path 8.23 ± 5.96 7.50 ± 3.47 14.05 ± 7.22 5.27 ± 2.11
Traffic density 7.41 ± 7.45 7.47 ± 4.24 14.93 ± 9.01 3.38 ± 1.75
Vegetation 7.44 ± 5.31 7.33 ± 2.63 10.70 ± 7.72 5.72 ± 2.69
Maintenance 7.37 ± 6.20 5.12 ± 2.92 13.69 ± 7.30 4.46 ± 2.44
Speedbump 2.79 ± 2.23 4.17 ± 3.05 3.09 ± 2.41 2.35 ± 1.73
  1. aAverage relative importances % (M + SD)