Skip to main content

Table 5 Descriptive statistics of service uptake outcomes at six months by study arm (percentages)

From: Randomized evaluation and cost-effectiveness of HIV and sexual and reproductive health service referral and linkage models in Zambia

Uptake of services at 6 months

 

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

 

Standard of care

Enhanced services

Enhanced services & escort

Tests

Females (n range)

283–559

273–555

273–547

 

 HIV testing and counseling

28.3

34.9

33.9

A†

 Family planning

23.7

19.3

22.3

 

 Cervical cancer screening

9.7

22.2

23.6

A***, B***

Males (n)

371

375

364

 

 Voluntary medical male circumcision

4.3

6.1

11.5

B***, C**

Both females and males (n range)

43–1070

57–1080

53–1054

 

 HIV care and treatment

8.0

9.5

10.0

 

 STI care and treatment

4.5

4.1

4.5

 

 TB testinga

18.8

24.5

37.3

B**, C*

 CD4 testing

63.5

73.5

71.6

 

 Initiated ARTa

93.0

100.0

98.1

A†

 Psychosocial support

15.3

12.9

16.7

 

Partners of clients (n range)

371–857

399–873

361–849

 

 HIV testing and counseling

33.9

35.1

39.2

B*, C†

 Family planning

25.1

23.9

21.4

 

 Voluntary medical male circumcision

3.6

6.3

5.4

A†

 Cervical cancer screening

12.6

14.9

13.7

 

 HIV care and treatment

7.3

8.3

8.5

 

 STI care and treatment

4.2

3.3

4.2

 
  1. A = Arms 1 & 2, B = Arms 1 & 3, C = Arms 2 & 3
  2. Note: Two cases are excluded for answering these questions for a six-week window instead of a six-month window
  3. Note: Sample sizes for client outcomes vary as each outcome is restricted to certain entry sites and a few participants chose to not disclose receipt of certain services
  4. Note: All tests are from bivariate cross-tabulations using chi-square tests for significance, unless otherwise noted
  5. ***p < .001; **p < .01; *p < .05; †p < .10
  6. aTested using Fisher’s exact test due to small cell sizes