Skip to main content

Table 4 Descriptive statistics of service uptake outcomes at six weeks by study arm (percentages)

From: Randomized evaluation and cost-effectiveness of HIV and sexual and reproductive health service referral and linkage models in Zambia

Uptake of services at 6 weeks

 

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

 

Standard of care

Enhanced services

Enhanced services & escort

Tests

Females (n range)

279–577

283–574

276–562

 

 HIV testing and counseling

13.4

17.2

21.3

B*

 Family planning

15.4

19.3

10.6

C**

 Cervical cancer screening

4.2

21.3

24.6

A***, B***

Males (n)

385

363

362

 

 Voluntary medical male circumcision

4.7

8.8

12.2

A*, B***

Both females and males (n range)

23–1104

37–1084

32–1070

 

 HIV care and treatment

8.5

9.4

10.7

B†

 STI care and treatment

3.8

4.6

4.2

 

 TB testinga

20.0

21.6

17.5

 

 CD4 testing

42.1

54.4

43.0

A†

 Initiated ARTa

95.7

86.5

87.5

 

 Psychosocial support

32.3

18.8

23.2

A*

Partners of clients (n range)

361–872

381–882

357–832

 

 HIV testing and counseling

21.0

23.2

23.0

 

 Family planning

16.3

17.0

17.9

 

 Voluntary medical male circumcision

3.9

3.7

5.5

 

 Cervical cancer screening

7.6

6.5

10.5

C†

 HIV care and treatment

7.8

7.9

9.0

 

 STI care and treatment

5.2

4.8

4.8

 
  1. A = Arms 1 & 2, B = Arms 1 & 3, C = Arms 2 & 3
  2. Note: Five cases are excluded for answering these questions for a 6-month window instead of a 6-week window
  3. Note: Sample sizes for client outcomes vary as each outcome is restricted to certain entry sites and a few participants chose not to disclose receipt of certain services
  4. Note: All tests are from bivariate cross-tabulations using chi-square tests for significance, unless otherwise noted
  5. ***p < .001; **p < .01; *p < .05; †p < .10
  6. aTested using Fisher’s exact test due to small cell sizes