Skip to main content

Table 2 CVCT promotional efforts by influential network agents and leaders by country

From: Promotion of couples’ voluntary HIV counseling and testing: a comparison of influence networks in Rwanda and Zambia

 

INAs

INLs

P value

Rwanda % (n/N) or mean (SD)

Zambia % (n/N) or mean (SD)

Rwanda % (n/N) or mean (SD)

Zambia % (n/N) or mean (SD)

Number hours per week promoting CVCT

28 (18)

18 (9)

5 (5)

10 (6)

*, **, ***, ****

Gave endorsement to group in past month

97 (32/33)

77 (41/53)

96 (27/28)

100 (31/31)

**, ***

Number of group endorsements in past month

2 (1)

4 (5)

6 (7)

10 (18)

*, ***

Number of attendees to group endorsements

38 (33)

55 (45)

101 (194)

102 (107)

**

Number of INAs present at public endorsements

n/a

n/a

4 (5)

8 (10)

****

Spoke to community leader in past month

88 (29/33)

79 (42/53)

89 (25/28)

81 (25/31)

n/s

Number of community leaders spoken to in past month

4 (3)

5 (5)

10 (13)

14 (13)

*, **

Public endorsement audience

*, ***, ****

 All public endorsement audiences

3 (1/30)

43 (17/40)

37 (10/27)

61 (19/31)

 Couples

63 (19/30)

10 (4/40)

26 (7/27)

3 (1/31)

 Married women

13 (4/30)

40 (16/40)

11 (3/27)

32 (10/31)

 Married men

3 (1/30)

5 (2/40)

0 (0/27)

3 (1/31)

 Men and Women (Not in relationships)

17 (5/30)

3 (1/40)

26 (7/27)

0 (0/31)

  1. *Significant (p < 0.05) differences between INAs and INLs in Rwanda
  2. **Significant (p < 0.05) differences between INAs and INLs in Zambia
  3. ***Significant (p < 0.05) differences between Rwandan and Zambian INAs
  4. ****Significant (p < 0.05) differences between Rwandan and Zambian INLs
  5. Note: denominators are variable due to missing data