Skip to main content

Table 2 Associations between FOBt screening uptake, sociodemographic characteristics, and having read the standard information booklet about FOBt screening, England, 2014, n = 1307

From: A lack of information engagement among colorectal cancer screening non-attenders: cross-sectional survey

 

Read none of 'The Facts' booklet

Adjusted OR* (95 % CI)

FOBt screening uptake status

 ‘Ever’

36 (4 %)

1.00 (ref)

 ‘Never’

251 (63 %)

39.0 (26.2, 58.1)

Age

 60-65

171 (25 %)

1.00 (ref)

 66-70

116 (19 %)

0.81 (0.56, 1.16)

Sex

 Female

154 (23 %)

1.00 (ref)

 Male

133 (21 %)

1.34 (0.93, 1.92)

Ethnicity

 White

255 (20 %)

1.00 (ref)

 Non-white

32 (55 %)

3.47 (1.60, 7.54)

Educational attainment

 Degree level or higher

49 (19 %)

1.00 (ref)

 School level

122 (21 %)

1.14 (0.67, 1.95)

 No formal qualifications

108 (26 %)

1.50 (0.82, 2.75)

 Missing

8 (14 %)

0.77 (0.26, 2.26)

Social grade

 A/B (upper/middle class)

56 (17 %)

1.00 (ref)

 C1 (lower middle class)

48 (17 %)

0.83 (0.47, 1.47)

 C2 (skilled working class)

50 (21 %)

1.00 (0.54, 1.85)

 D (working class)

44 (29 %)

1.35 (0.68, 2.67)

 E (non-working/unemployed)

89 (30 %)

1.26 (0.72, 2.23)

  1. *All variables in the table are mutually adjusted for in the logistic regression model. The ORs are for reading 'none' versus 'a little'/'some'/'most'/'almost all'/'all' of The Facts booklet