Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost-effectiveness analysis of offering free leisure centre memberships to physically inactive members of the public receiving state benefits: a case study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Frew
10 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erik Groessl
23 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford
21 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Talitha Verhoef
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emma Frew
17 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford
23 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Talitha Verhoef
Resubmission - Version 3
23 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Jul 2016 Editorially accepted
22 Jul 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12889-016-3300-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement