Cost-effectiveness analysis of offering free leisure centre memberships to physically inactive members of the public receiving state benefits: a case study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emma Frew|
|10 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erik Groessl|
|23 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford|
|21 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Talitha Verhoef|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emma Frew|
|17 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford|
|23 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Talitha Verhoef|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jul 2016||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jul 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12889-016-3300-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.