Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A qualitative evaluation of a novel intervention using insight into tobacco industry tactics to prevent the uptake of smoking in school-aged children

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jul 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roger Thomas
13 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hadii Mamudu
13 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - John Taylor
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - John Taylor
Resubmission - Version 3
4 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - John Taylor
Resubmission - Version 4
27 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
8 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - John Taylor
Resubmission - Version 5
8 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Jun 2016 Editorially accepted
11 Jul 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12889-016-3205-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement