Skip to main content

Table 3 Perceptions about Corner Stores and Patronage by Intervention Status and Time

From: Substantial improvements not seen in health behaviors following corner store conversions in two Latino food swamps

Ā 

Intervention

Comparison

Percent or Mean Difference (Follow-up ā€“ Baseline)

Percent or Mean (SD)

Percent or Mean (SD)

Ā 

Baseline

Follow-up

Baseline

Follow-up

Intervention

Comparison

Ā 

(Nā€‰=ā€‰313)

(Nā€‰=ā€‰323)

(Nā€‰=ā€‰482)

(Nā€‰=ā€‰568)

Ā Ā 

Corner Store Characteristics

Corner stores sell a wide variety of fresh fruits

8.9

26.3***

18.5

26.6**

17.4

8.1

Corner stores sell a wide variety of fresh vegetables

10.9

35.6***

19.5

29.6***

24.7

10.1

Corner stores sell a wide variety of frozen or canned fruits

27.2

36.2*

31.1

42.3***

9.0

11.2***

Corner stores sell a wide variety of frozen or canned vegetables

25.9

35.3*

30.5

41.7***

9.4

11.2**

Fresh fruits sold at corner stores are not of poor qualitya

40.0

45.5

44.2

51.4*

5.5

7.2

The fresh vegetables sold at corner stores are of good quality

22.7

44.0***

25.1

30.3

21.3

5.2

Corner stores sell healthy food

34.2

51.4***

37.6

45.2*

17.2

7.6

Corner stores are not dirtyb

60.1

77.4***

66.2

68.8

17.3

2.6

Corner stores are not dangerousc

70.0

83.9***

75.5

75.2

13.9

āˆ’0.3

Corner stores have good customer service

73.5

85.4***

70.5

75.0

11.9

4.5

I can get information about nutrition and healthy eating at corner stores

10.2

28.5***

12.9

16.2

18.3

3.3

Corner stores sell traditional Latino food ingredients

77.0

83.6*

76.6

83.5**

6.6

6.9***

The staff at corner stores speaks my language

86.3

92.0*

82.8

90.7***

5.7

7.9

Food sold at corner stores is not expensived

20.4

22.6

28.2

28.0

2.2

āˆ’0.2

It is convenient to shop at corner stores

47.6

50.5

49.4

52.3

2.9

2.9

Overall Beliefs About Corner Stores Score (Range: 0-15

6.1 (3.4)

8.0 (3.6)***

6.7 (3.4)

7.6 (3.6)***

1.9

1.0

Corner Store Patronage

Shops at 1 or more study stores

41.5

46.7

28.2

23.4

5.2

āˆ’4.8***

  1. NOTES: Significant differences in binary variables were tested between intervention baseline and follow-up using chi-squared tests, comparison baseline and follow-up using chi-squared tests, and percent difference (follow-up ā€“ baseline) for intervention and comparison using a Wald test on the interaction term of a logistic regression (more details can be seen in Additional file 2: Table S2). This Wald test can be thought of as testing whether the relative change (on an odds ratio scale) is the same in the intervention and comparison groups. Significant differences in continuous variables were tested between intervention baseline and follow-up using independent sample t-tests, comparison baseline and follow-up using independent sample t-tests tests, and mean difference (follow-up ā€“ baseline) for intervention and comparison using a F-test on the interaction term of a linear regression (more details can be seen in Additional file 3: Table S3)
  2. *pā€‰<ā€‰0.05, **pā€‰<ā€‰0.01, ***pā€‰<ā€‰0.001
  3. aQuestion was reverse coded. Original statement was ā€œFresh fruits sold at corner stores are of poor qualityā€
  4. bQuestion was reverse coded. Original statement was ā€œCorner stores are dirtyā€
  5. cQuestion was reverse coded. Original statement was ā€œCorner stores are dangerousā€
  6. dQuestion was reverse coded. Original statement was ā€œFood sold at corner stores is expensiveā€