This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessing the nutritional quality of diets of Canadian children and adolescents using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System
© Jessri et al. 2016
Received: 24 August 2015
Accepted: 6 February 2016
Published: 10 May 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Sep 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Mahsa Jessri|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Sep 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anand Ahankari|
|28 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joan Bentzen|
|10 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dara Ford|
|12 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sudip Banik|
|17 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mahsa Jessri|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|10 May 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12889-016-3038-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.