Table 6 Relationships between LUCIE and self-rated circumstances in private life and family-to-work interference
LUCIE | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step1 GG | Step 2 YG | Step 3 RG | 1Step 4 RR | Chi-square test | |||||
(n = 881) | (n = 282) | (n = 117) | (n = 67) | ||||||
% | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | P-value | |
Private life | <0.001 | ||||||||
Not at all | 51a | 446 | 31b | 88 | 28b | 33 | 31b | 21 | |
To some extent | 41a | 357 | 50b | 139 | 45a,b | 53 | 31a | 21 | |
Quite a lot | 9a | 76 | 19b | 53 | 26b,c | 31 | 37c | 5 | |
Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA | |||||||||
Family-to-work interference | Mdn | 10 − 90 | Mdn | 10 − 90 | Mdn | 10 − 90 | Mdn | 10 − 90 | P-value |
Total sum score2 | 1.0a | 0 − 4.0 | 2.0b | 0 − 5.0 | 3.0b | 0 − 6.0 | 3.0b | 0 − 6.0 | <0.001 |