Skip to main content

Table 2 Influence of nonconsent on presence and magnitude of associations with caregiver burden and caregiver satisfactiona

From: Survey nonresponse among informal caregivers: effects on the presence and magnitude of associations with caregiver burden and satisfaction

Ā 

Nonconsent

Consent

Interaction

Ā 

(Nā€‰=ā€‰3348)

(Nā€‰=ā€‰5095)

(variable * consent)

Ā 

OR

(95Ā % CI)

OR

(95Ā % CI)

OR

(95Ā % CI)

p

Caregiver burden

Medium burden vs. low burden

ā€ƒCaregiving duration

1.00

(.99ā€“1.01)

1.02

(1.01ā€“1.03)

1.02

(1.01ā€“1.04)

.009

High burden vs. low burden

ā€ƒAge

.99

(.99ā€“1.00)

.98

(.98ā€“.99)

.99

(.98ā€“1.00)

.049

ā€ƒCaring for spouse

1.22

(.93ā€“1.61)

1.83

(.99ā€“3.40)

1.50

(1.06ā€“2.12)

.024

ā€ƒLiving together with care recipient

1.91

(1.55ā€“2.37)

2.68

(2.25ā€“3.19)

1.40

(1.06ā€“1.84)

.017

ā€ƒ1ā€“4Ā h household care (vs. 0Ā h)

.97

(.78ā€“1.20)

1.31

(1.10ā€“1.56)

1.36

(1.03ā€“1.79)

.032

ā€ƒ>8Ā h household care (vs. 0Ā h)

2.15

(1.54ā€“2.99)

4.42

(3.34ā€“5.85)

2.06

(1.34ā€“3.17)

.001

Caregiver satisfaction

Medium satisfaction vs. low satisfaction

ā€ƒFemale

1.05

(.87ā€“1.28)

.73

(.62ā€“.86)

.70

(.54ā€“.90)

.006

ā€ƒ4ā€“8Ā h personal care (vs. 0Ā h)

.55

(.32ā€“.95)

1.08

(.78ā€“1.49)

1.95

(1.00ā€“3.77)

.052

High satisfaction vs. low satisfaction

ā€ƒFemale

1.01

(.83ā€“1.23)

.78

(.66ā€“.92)

.77

(.60ā€“1.00)

.046

ā€ƒCaring for parent

.74

(.62ā€“.87)

.93

(.93ā€“1.07)

1.27

(1.01ā€“1.58)

.040

  1. OR Odds Ratio, 95ā€‰% CI 95Ā % confidence interval
  2. ORs are based on multinomial logistic regression models, each containing the specific variable itself, the variable consent yes/no, and the interaction term of the two variables
  3. aOnly statistically significant interactions with consent yes/no are presented (pā€‰<ā€‰.05)