Skip to main content

Table 5 Quality appraisal of included quantitative studies (n = 18)

From: A systematic review of the health and well-being impacts of school gardening: synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence

First author (year)

EPHPP criteria for quantitative studies

Selection bias

Study design

Confounders

Blinding

Data collection

Withdrawals and dropouts

Overall rating

Block (2012) [24]

Block (2009) [25]

Gibbs (2013) [26]

Weak

Strong

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Strong

Weak

Brouwer (2013) [21]

Weak

Strong

Weak

Moderate

Strong

Weak

Weak

Christian (2014) (1), [9] Christian (2014) (2) Trial 1 [10]

Weak

Strong

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Christian (2014) (2) Trial 2 [10]

Weak

Strong

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Cotter (2012) [22]

Weak

Strong

Weak

Moderate

Strong

Strong

Weak

Cotugna (2012) [27]

Moderate

Strong

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Weak

Davis (2011) [28]

Gatto (2012) [29]

Moderate

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Strong

Strong

Moderate

Jaenke (2012) [15]

Morgan (2010) [30]

Moderate

Moderate

Strong

Moderate

Weak

Strong

Moderate

McAleese (2007) [16]

Weak

Strong

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Meinen (2012) [31]

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Morris (2001) [32]

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Morris (2002) (1) [33]

Morris (2002) (2) [34]

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Strong

Weak

O’Brien (2006) [35]

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Parmer (2007) [36]

Parmer (2009) [37]

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Ratcliffe (2011) [38]

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Robinson (2005) [39]

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

Waliczek (2001) [17]

Weak

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Strong

Weak

Weak

Wells (2014) [23]

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

  1. Where multiple publications reported quantitative data from the same study, they were appraised as one study