Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimated impact of macroeconomic conditions on the association between youth occupational status and FSS in adulthood (β, 95 % Confidence interval)

From: The impact of economic recession on the association between youth unemployment and functional somatic symptoms in adulthood: a difference-in-difference analysis from Sweden

 

Pre-recession

Recession

DiD between recession and pre-recession

Crude model

Full model

Crude model

Full model

Crude model

Full model

Unemp

Emp

Diffa

Unemp

Emp

Diffa

Unemp

Emp

Diffa

Unemp

Emp

Diffa

DiDb

DiDb

Total sample (n=)

159

827

 

152

762

 

252

419

 

230

379

 

1657

1523

FSS

5.62

3.97

1.65***

5.33

4.06

1.27***

4.42

3.65

0.77***

3.74

3.45

0.30

−0.88**

−0.98**

Standard error

0.26

0.11

 

0.71

0.75

 

0.21

0.16

 

0.80

0.73

   

Men (n=)

84

426

 

81

391

 

129

208

 

120

188

 

847

780

FSS

5.61

3.38

2.23***

4.65

2.88

1.78***

3.81

3.04

0.78**

3.19

2.79

0.41

−1.45**

−1.37**

Standard error

0.31

0.14

 

0.80

0.64

 

0.25

0.20

 

0.72

0.64

   

Women (n=)

75

401

 

71

371

 

123

211

 

110

191

 

810

743

FSS

5.64

4.60

1.04**

3.85

3.15

0.69

5.06

4.26

0.80**

2.04

1.92

0.11

−0.24

−0.58

Standard error

0.41

0.18

 

1.12

1.12

 

0.32

0.24

 

1.12

1.14

   
  1. *** p < 0.01; ** p < 0.05
  2. Full model adjusted for education, parents’ occupational class, smoking, FSS, living arrangement, income, doing what they want, outlook on the future and low cash margin
  3. aDifference in adulthood FSS between unemployed and employed youths within the pre-recession and the recession
  4. bDifference-in-difference in adulthood FSS between unemployed and employed youths in the recession and in the pre-recession