Skip to main content

Table 4 Environmental correlates of sedentary behaviours in adults

From: A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach

Environmental Correlates of Sedentary Behaviours in Adults (18–65 years)

Factors (n = total studies)

Total screen time

Leisure screen time

Transport sitting time

Total sitting time

Leisure sitting time

Total Objective SB

Home/work indoor environment

 Number of PCs at home (n = 1)

 

+ [55]

    

 Number of TVs at home (n = 2)

 

nr [55]

  

nr [16]

 

 Size of the largest TV set (n = 1)

 

+ [55]

    

 Shower facilities at work (n = 1)

     

+ [86]b

 Lockers for clothes at work (n = 1)

     

+ [86]b

 Safe bike storage at work (n = 1)

     

+ [86]b

 Habitat surface area (n = 1)

    

- [17]

ns [17]

 

 Habitat type (apartment vs. house) (n = 1)

    

ns [17]

 

Physical environment

 Type of residence (n = 1)

   

nr [10]

  

 Not many cul-de-sacs/barriers in  neighbourhood (n = 1)

  

+ [60]

nr [60]

  

 Aesthetics/attractiveness (n = 6)

 

nr [9], [62]W (med)

+ [85]W

nr [60]a

- [60]a

nr [10]

nr [16]

 

 Proximity/density of green spaces (n = 2)

   

- [12]O, [14]O

  

 Neighbourhood walkability (n = 5)

 

- [34]W a O, [59]a O,

[9] nwra O

- [59]a O

+ [82]a O

- [59]a O

nr [8]W a O

nr [59]a O

+ [82]a O

nr [59]a O

 Walking and/or cycling facilities (n = 4)

 

- [11]

nr [9]

+ [60]a

nr [60]a, [47]

  

 Street connectivity (n = 2)

  

- [83]u O

nr [60]a

nr [60]a

  

 Land –use mix (n = 1)

  

- [83]u O

   

 Traffic safety (n = 4)

 

nr [9], [11]

nr [60]a

+[10]W

- [60]W a

  

 Air/noise pollution (n = 1)

   

+ [47]

  

 Weather as a barrier (n = 3)

   

+ [47], [67], [52]

  

 Season (n = 1)

     

nr [13]O

 Living outside State Capital (n = 1)

 

+ [48]O

    

 Living rurally (vs. urban) (n = 5)

  

+[15]o, [77]o

- [24]w, [27]WO

+ u[28]

 

 Region (n = 1)

     

nr [13]O

Services available in the environment

 Access to services (n = 4)

 

nr [11]

nr [60]a

- [60]m a

nr [47]

nr [16]

 

 Proximity/distance to destinations (n = 3)

 

nr [62]W (med) a

nr [60]a

- [60]m a

nr [10]

  

 Access to recreation facilities (n = 4)

 

nr [11]

 

- [52], [67]

nr [10]

  

 Public transport infrastructure (n = 2)

 

- [11]

 

nr [10]

  

 Parking difficult near local shopping areas (n = 1)

  

nr [60]

nr [60]

  

Socio-demographic environment

 Neighbourhood SES (n = 7)

 

- [8]W a O, − [34]w O

nr [9]O, [59]

 

+ [79]a

+ u [49]a O

- u [49]a O

nr [59]O

+ [59]O

nr [49]a O

+ [59]O

nr [82]O

 Neighbourhood deprivation (n = 3)

 

+ [80]a O, [22]a O

 

+ [18](med)

nr [22]a O occ

 

nr [22]a O

 Residential density (n = 3)

 

nr [11]

– [83]O

nr [60]a

+ [60]a

  

Neighbourhood safety

 Safe park (n = 1)

 

- [11]

    

 Neighbourhood safety (n = 8)

 

nr [9], [11], [62]W a

+ [85]W

nr [60]a

- [60]W a

nr [10], [47]

nr [16]

 

 Neighbourhood problems (n = 1)

 

+ [84]w

    
  1. Note: Each result is reported as positive (+), negative (−), or not related (nr) for objective or self-reported/perceived environmental measure. Objective measures are identified as (°). Significant associations only in subgroups are identified as men (M), women (w), non-workers (nwr), and other (u). occ refers to occupational time. S refers to significant differences between groups. For two studies [18, 62] the studied factor was investigated as a mediator and identified as (med). aComposite environmental measure (e.g., neighbourhood deprivation index), bFeature included in a composite environmental measure