Skip to main content

Table 2 Design accumulation rates and actual excreta filling rates

From: Are pit latrines in urban areas of Sub-Saharan Africa performing? A review of usage, filling, insects and odour nuisances

Design/Place

Filling rates litres/capita/annum (l/c/a)

Reference

Design accumulation rates

  

EG Wagner and JN Lanoix [16] and R Franceys, et al. [15]

40

Wet pits where degradable anal cleansing material is used

 

60

Wet pits where non degradable anal cleansing material is used

 

60

Dry pits where degradable anal cleansing material is used

 

90

Dry pits where non degradable anal cleansing material is used

Reported pit latrine filling rates

  

EG Wagner and JN Lanoix [18] and R Franceys, et al. [15]

25 (ablution water used) 35 Wet pit

West Bengal, India

EG Wagner and JN Lanoix [18]

40 (solid cleansing material)

Philippines

PR Morgan, et al. [57]

20

Zimbabwe PR Morgan, et al. [94]

R Franceys, et al. [15]

42

USA

 

47

Brazil

JN Bhagwan, et al. [110]

24.1 (mean)

Soshongove, South Africa

 

69.4 (mean)

JN Bhagwan, et al. [110] Bester’s Camp, South Africa

 

18.5 (mean)

Mbila, South Africa

 

27.5 (implied)

Gabarone, Dares salaam

 

29 (median)

Mbazwana, South Africa

 

34 (median)

Inadi, South Africa

DA Still and K Foxon [53]

39 (median)

Limpopo, South Africa

 

48 (median)

Mafunze, South Africa

 

21 (median)

Ezimangweni, South Africa

 

19 (mean)

eThekwine, South Africa