Skip to main content

Table 1 Participant details

From: Shedding light on research participation effects in behaviour change trials: a qualitative study examining research participant experiences

ID

Placemet

Age

Sex

Occupation

Country of Origina

Primary Behaviour

Secondary Behaviour, tRandomisation outcome

1

London park

31

M

student

Italy

unhealthy diet

- intervention

2

London park

37

M

security controller

UK

smoking

risky drinking, intervention

3

London park

36

M

builder

UK

smoking

risky drinking, control

4

London park

30

M

public relations

UK

smoking

risky drinking, control

5

London park

28

F

PhD student

Germany

smoking

unhealthy diet, intervention

6

London park

47

M

academic researcher

UK

lack of exercise

-control

7

London pub

32

M

sales person

UK

risky drinking

-intervention

8

London park

25

F

student

UK

unhealthy diet

risky drinking, control

9

London park

19

M

student

UK

risky drinking

-control

10

London park

32

M

engineer

UK

Unhealthy diet

risky drinking, intervention

11

London park

45

M

company director

UK

smoking

risky drinking, intervention

12

London park

52

F

musician

UK

unhealthy diet

lack of exercise, control

13

London park

38

M

market researcher

UK

lack of exercise

unhealthy diet, intervention

14

London park

34

M

computer engineer

UK

unhealthy diet

risky drinking, control

15

London park

21

M

student

South Asia

unhealthy diet

-intervention

16

London park

28

F

youth worker

Poland

unhealthy diet

risky drinking, control

17

London park

28

F

archivist

UK

unhealthy diet

-control

18

London park

57

M

Door Manager

UK

unhealthy diet

risky drinking, control

19

London park

24

M

student

UK

risky drinking

-intervention

20

London park

24

F

student

Sweden

unhealthy diet

risky drinking, control

  1. aCountry of origin - observed/ learned through discussion during the interview. T In this paper secondary behaviours were disregarded as there was insufficient detail in the interview data as not the focus of the discussion