Skip to main content

Table 4 Models of the associations between sexual risk behaviours and circumcision status with combined data from the 2004 and 2011 UAIS

From: A comparison of sexual risk behaviours and HIV seroprevalence among circumcised and uncircumcised men before and after implementation of the safe male circumcision programme in Uganda

  Had multiple sexual partners in last 12 months Used a condom at last non marital sex
Unadjusted, Adjusted, Unadjusted, Adjusted,
PR [95 % CI] PR [95 % CI] PR [95 % CI] PR [95 % CI]
Circumciseda     
No 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Yes 1.51* [1.37,1.66] 1.42* [1.29,1.56] 1.07 [0.96,1.20] 1.02 [0.93,1.12]
Survey     
2004 UAIS 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
2011 UAIS 0.93 [0.84,1.03] 0.92 [0.83,1.02] 0.93 [0.84,1.03] 0.99 [0.91,1.07]
Interaction term (circumcision and survey) 0.90 [0.77,1.04] 0.89 [0.77,1.03] 0.82* [0.70,0.97] 0.81* [0.71,0.93]
Number of men 14757 14743 4181 4178
  1. aAdjusted for highest education level, Age, Marital status, Survey region, Residence, and Wealth status
  2. *p < 0.05