A comparison of sexual risk behaviours and HIV seroprevalence among circumcised and uncircumcised men before and after implementation of the safe male circumcision programme in Uganda

Table 4 Models of the associations between sexual risk behaviours and circumcision status with combined data from the 2004 and 2011 UAIS

	Had multiple sexual partners in last 12 months		Used a condom at last non marital sex
	Unadjusted,	Adjusted,	Unadjusted,	Adjusted,
	PR [95 % CI]	PR [95 % CI]	PR [95 % CI]	PR [95 % CI]
Circumcised^a
No	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
Yes	1.51* [1.37,1.66]	1.42* [1.29,1.56]	1.07 [0.96,1.20]	1.02 [0.93,1.12]
Survey
2004 UAIS	1.0	1.0	1.0	1.0
2011 UAIS	0.93 [0.84,1.03]	0.92 [0.83,1.02]	0.93 [0.84,1.03]	0.99 [0.91,1.07]
Interaction term (circumcision and survey)	0.90 [0.77,1.04]	0.89 [0.77,1.03]	0.82* [0.70,0.97]	0.81* [0.71,0.93]
Number of men	14757	14743	4181	4178

^aAdjusted for highest education level, Age, Marital status, Survey region, Residence, and Wealth status
*p < 0.05

ISSN: 1471-2458