Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associated with weight status misperception from multinomial logistic regressiona,b

From: Weight perception and its association with socio-demographic and health-related factors among Korean adolescents

Variables

Boys and girls

Boys

Girls

Underestimate

Overestimate

Underestimate

Overestimate

Underestimate

Overestimate

OR (95 % CI)

OR (95 % CI)

OR (95 % CI)

OR (95 % CI)

OR (95 % CI)

OR (95 % CI)

Gender

      

 Boys (ref)

      

 Girls

0.70 (0.49–0.98)*

1.47 (1.17–1.85)**

    

Age

0.93 (0.85–1.01)

1.02 (0.96–1.08)

0.98 (0.88–1.09)

0.91 (0.83–0.98)*

0.77 (0.65–0.90)**

1.14 (1.06–1.23)**

BMI

1.18 (1.12–1.24)***

1.05 (1.02–1.08)**

1.10 (1.03–1.17)**

1.07 (1.03–1.11)**

1.36 (1.23–1.50)***

1.02 (0.98–1.07)

Household income quartile

      

 Lowest (ref)

      

 Middle-low

1.04 (0.54–2.01)

0.82 (0.53–1.26)

1.06 (0.40–2.80)

0.61 (0.33–1.13)

0.89 (0.39–2.01)

1.06 (0.59–1.89)

 Middle-high

0.77 (0.40–1.48)

0.83 (0.55–1.27)

0.93 (0.36–2.38)

0.74 (0.40–1.37)

0.47 (0.19–1.12)

0.97 (0.55–1.70)

 Highest

0.85 (0.44–1.63)

0.83 (0.54–1.29)

0.94 (0.37–2.39)

0.79 (0.41–1.50)

0.59 (0.23–1.52)

0.95 (0.53–1.68)

Place of residence

      

 Urban area (ref)

      

 Rural area

1.25 (0.80–1.94)

0.76 (0.54–1.06)

1.02 (0.52–2.00)

1.08 (0.66–1.77)

1.48 (.78–2.81)

0.55 (0.35–0.86)**

Maternal obesity

      

 No (ref)

      

 Yes

1.16 (0.83–1.62)

1.09 (0.86–1.38)

1.16 (0.74–1.82)

1.22 (0.85–1.76)

1.05 (0.59–1.87)

1.03 (0.74–1.43)

Maternal educational level

      

 ≤ Middle school (ref)

      

 High school

1.68 (1.00–2.82)

1.15 (0.85–1.57)

1.52 (0.80–2.88)

1.17 (0.73–1.88)

2.29 (1.05–5.01)*

1.19 (0.77–1.83)

 ≥ College

1.55 (0.87–2.77)

1.03 (0.71–1.49)

1.72 (0.86–3.42)

1.01 (0.58–1.77)

1.43 (.55–3.73)

1.06 (0.66–1.71)

  1. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
  2. aOdds ratio refers to the odds of incorrect perception of weight status (overestimate or underestimate)
  3. bGender was removed in the gender-stratified analysis