Skip to main content

Table 4 BIPQ scale correlations (r) in the 3 study groups

From: Comparison of perceptions of obesity among adults with central obesity with and without additional cardiometabolic risk factors and among those who were formally obese, 3 years after screening for central obesity

 

BIPQ scale

Timeline

Personal control

Behavioural control – physical activity

Identity

Illness concern

Behavioural control - diet

Emotional representation

Persistent cardiometabolic risk group (n = 80)

Consequence

0.29**

0.15

0.10

0.71**

0.68**

0.15

0.61**

 

Timeline

 

0.05

0.08

0.36**

0.36**

0.10

0.21

 

Personal control

  

0.23*

−0.01

0.07

0.23*

0.02

 

Behavioural control – physical activity

   

−0.03

0.14

0.43**

−0.04

 

Identity

    

0.67**

0.21

0.58**

 

Illness concern

     

0.24*

0.51**

 

Behavioural control - diet

      

0.11

Persistent obesity group (n = 63)

Consequence

−0.07

−0.20

0.29*

0.62**

0.66**

0.35**

0.60**

 

Timeline

 

−0.20

−0.04

−0.02

−0.10

−0.08

−0.01

 

Personal control

  

0.03

−0.19

−0.08

−0.01

−0.07

 

Behavioural control – physical activity

   

0.32*

0.30*

0.55**

0.28*

 

Identity

    

0.67**

0.20

0.56**

 

Illness concern

     

0.34**

0.63**

 

Behavioural control - diet

      

0.52**

Improved cardiometabolic risk group

Consequence

0.42**

0.33**

0.15

0.63**

0.75**

0.35*

0.36*

 

Timeline

 

−0.18

−0.06

0.61**

0.61**

−0.09

0.18

 

Personal control

  

0.50**

0.12

0.22*

0.32*

0.07

 

Behavioural control – physical activity

   

0.07

0.32*

0.42**

0.09

 

Identity

    

0.62**

0.15

0.30*

 

Illness concern

     

0.20

0.45**

 

Behavioural control - diet

      

0.32*

  1. Spearman correlation coefficients
  2. *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
  3. **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)