This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment
© van der Linden et al. 2015
Received: 5 August 2015
Accepted: 23 November 2015
Published: 3 December 2015
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Oct 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Sander van der Linden|
|9 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Piero Poletti|
|30 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sabine Rohrmann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Oct 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Nov 2015||Editorially accepted|
|3 Dec 2015||Article published||10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.