Skip to main content

Table 4 Results of individual and combined regional level Paired Sample t-test (pre and post intervention) – Theory of Planned Behaviour constructs shown to have good internal reliability

From: Evaluating a handwashing with soap program in Australian remote Aboriginal communities: a pre and post intervention study design

 

Number of participants

Meana

Standard deviation

Correlation

Significance

Attitude overall

Top End Region

 Pre

28

6.20

1.75

−0.111

0.573

Post

28

6.54

0.60

Central Australian Region

 Pre

45

6.60

1.12

0.212

0.163

Post

45

6.70

0.72

Kimberley Region

 Pre

26

6.60

0.91

0.762

0.000**

Post

26

6.75

0.68

All communities

 Pre

99

6.49

1.29

0.205

0.041**

Post

99

6.67

0.68

Perceived behavioural control

Top end region

 Pre

28

5.31

1.67

0.038

0.847

Post

28

4.95

1.46

Central Australian Region

 Pre

45

6.40

0.95

−0.121

0.429

Post

45

5.89

1.87

Kimberley Region

 Pre

26

5.42

1.88

0.324

0.106

Post

26

5.47

1.97

All communities

 Pre

99

5.83

1.53

0.151

0.136

Post

99

5.51

1.82

Generalised intention

Top End Region

 Pre

28

5.15

2.26

−0.183

0.351

Post

28

5.10

2.01

Central Australian Region

 Pre

45

6.29

1.22

−0.132

0.388

Post

45

6.06

1.89

Kimberley Region

 Pre

26

5.80

2.01

0.324

0.106

Post

26

6.23

1.68

All communities

 Pre

99

5.84

1.82

.030

0.765

Post

99

5.83

1.91

  1. aConstruct scale score range 1 – 7 **Significance at p = <0.05 level