Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Odds ratios from PLUM-ordinal regressions relating IMHS at 21 and exposure to open unemployment or youth programs at 18–21

From: Do open youth unemployment and youth programs leave the same mental health scars? - Evidence from a Swedish 27-year cohort study

  Model 1 Model2 Model 3 Model 4a
  OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI OR 95 % CI
Open unemployment 18–21 (no exp. ref.)         
Yes 2.53*** 1.82–3.52    2.53*** 1.77–3.60 2.48*** 1.57–3.60
Youth programs 18–21 (no exp. ref.)         
Yes    1.24 0.97–1.59 1.01 0.78–1.31 0.95 0.72–1.26
IMHS at age 16 1.58*** 1.45–1.72 1.58*** 1.45–1.72 1.58*** 1.45–1.72 1.46*** 1.34–1.60
Pseudo R-square         
Cox and Snell 0.12   0.10   0.12   0.15  
Nagelkerke 0.13   0.11   0.13   0.16  
  1. a Covariates added in model 4: Gender, long-term somatic health problems at 16, truancy at 16, parental social class at 16, parental employment at 16, living with both parents at 16, paternal health problems at 16
  2. *** = p < 0.001. ** = p < 0.01. * = 0.05, OR = Odds Ratio, 95 % CI = 95 % Confidence Interval