Skip to main content

Table 2 Study effects for IPV outcomes

From: Systematic review of structural interventions for intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries: organizing evidence for prevention

First author (year)

Physical

Psychological1

Sexual

Economic

Controlling behaviors

Multiple types

Abramsky (2014) [6]

NS

 

NS

   

Ahmed (2005) [24]

     

NS

Bobonis (2013) [25]

NS

NS

NS

  

NS

Das (2012) [26]

      

Green (2015) [27] Trial 1

    

*

NS

Trial 2

    

NS

NS

Gupta (2013) [28]

NS

 

NS

*

 

NS

Hidrobo (2013) [29]

NS

NS

  

*

 

Hossain (2014) [30]

NS

 

NS

  

NS

Jewkes (2008) [31]

     

NS

Jewkes (2014) [32]

NS

 

* / NS2

  

* / NS2

Kim (2007) [33]

    

NS

*

Kim (2009) [34]

    

NS

* / NS3

Kyegombe (2014) [35]

  

NS

   

Miller (2014) [36]

      

Pronyk (2006) [37]

    

NS

*

Pronyk (2008) [38]

      

Pulerwitz (2015) [39]

NS

* / NS4

   

*

Pulerwitz (2015) [40]

     

NS / unknown5

Usdin (2005) [41]

      

Wagman (2015) [42]

* / NS6

* / NS7

* / NS6

   
  1. *Significant at p < 0.05 or 95 % confidence interval not including unity
  2. NS = not significant
  3. 1Psychological IPV includes author-defined psychological, emotional, and verbal violence and threats of physical violence
  4. 2Significant for women*, not significant for men
  5. 3Significant for IMAGE v. control*, not significant for microfinance v. control or IMAGE v. microfinance
  6. 4Significant for workers*, not significant for students
  7. 5P-values not presented for all statistics from multivariate regression models
  8. 6Significant for women at 35 months*, not significant for men at 35 months, women at 16 months, or men at 16 months
  9. 7Significant for men at 16 months*, not significant for women at 35 months, men at 35 months, or women at 16 months
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us