Skip to main content

Table 3 Under what conditions group-based physical activity interventions are effective

From: Understanding for whom, under what conditions, and how group-based physical activity interventions are successful: a realist review

 

Design

Recruitment procedures

Program setting

Measures

Positive effect group-versus-individuals/aggregate (n =39)

Randomized with control (n =13)

Recruitment Strategies

Program Location

Physical Activity Outcome

 Mass or local media (n=11)

 Medical center (n =3)

 Subjective (n =23)

Quasi-experimental with control (n =8)

 Word of Mouth (n=3)

 Fitness facility (n =4)

 Objective (n =6)

 Physician Referral (n=5)

 University (n =3)

 Mix (n =10)

Quasi-experimental without control (n =3)

 Flyers (n=11)

 Worksite (n =5)

ITT

Pre-post design (n =15)

 Center-based (n=7)

 General community (n=5)

 Yes (n =6)

 Employer’s Worksite (n=5)

 Faith-based location (n =2)

 No (n =39)

 Faith-based (n=5)

 Center-based (n =3)

Reported Costs

 Target Mailings (n=16)

 Other (n =7)

 Yes (n =5)

 Targeted Contact (n=8)

 Not reported (n =7)

 No (n =34

 Presentation/Seminar (n=8)

Country

Timing of Post-Program Assessment

 Other (n=2)

 USA (n =33)

 14.75 weeks (±31.69)

 Not Reported (n=2)

 Canada (n =3)

Moderation Analyses

Sample Selection

 Middle East (n =2)

(n=4 interventions)

 Convenience Sampling (n =2)

 Australia (n =1)

 Gender (n=2)

 Random Selection (n =5)

Average Setting Sample Size

 Age (n=1)

 Targeted (n =26)

 17.76 (±31.39)

 Baseline activity level (n=2)

 Convenience and Targeted (n =1)

Average Setting Adoption Rate

 Self-monitoring (n=1)

 Random and Targeted (n =3)

 77.25 % (±25.55 %)

 Member Diversity (n=1)

 Not specified (n=2)

 Not report (n =31)

 Perceived health (n=1)

Physician Referral

 Distance to Group Sessions (n=1)

 Yes (n=5)

 Socio-economic status (n=2)

 No (n =34)

Group-versus-group interventions (n =9)

Randomized with control (n =3)

Recruitment Strategies

Program Location

Physical Activity Outcome

 Mass or local media (n=2)

 Medical center (n =3)

 Subjective (n=2)

 Word of Mouth (n=3)

 Faith-based location (n =2)

 Objective (n=0)

Quasi-experimental with control (n =4)

 Physician Referral (n=2)

 Nursing home (n =1)

 Mix (n=7)

 Flyers (n=3)

 Cooperative extension (n =1)

ITT

 Center-based (n=1)

 Not reported (n =2)

 Yes (n =2)

 Employer’s Worksite (n=1)

Country

 No (n=7)

Quasi-experimental without control (n =1)

 Faith-based (n=1)

 USA (n =7)

Reported Costs

 Target Mailings (n=2)

 Canada (n =2)

 Yes (n=1)

 Targeted Contact (n=3)

Average Setting Sample Size

 No (n =8)

 Other (n=1)

 4.17 (±3.82)

 Moderation Analyses

Pre-post design (n =1)

 Not Reported (n=1)

Average Setting Adoption Rate

 (n=0)

Sample Selection

 Not report (n =9)

 

 Convenience Sampling (n =2)

 Random Selection (n =0)

 Targeted (n =6)

 Convenience and Targeted (n =1)

 Random and Targeted (n =0)

 Not specified (n =0)

Physician Referral

 Yes (n =2)

 No (n =7)

No increase in physical activity (n=4)

Randomized with control (n =3)

Recruitment Strategies

Program Location

Physical Activity Outcome

 Word of Mouth (n=1)

 Medical center (n =1)

 Subjective (n =4)

 Flyers (n=3)

 Worksite (n =1)

 Objective (n =0)

Quasi-experimental with control (n =1)

 Center-based (n=1)

 Faith-based location (n=1)

 Mix (n =0)

 Target Contact (n=1)

 Not reported (n=1)

ITT

Sample Selection

Country

 Yes (n =1)

 Convenience Sampling (n =0)

 USA (n =3)

 No (n =3)

 Random Selection (n =0)

 Australia (n =1)

Reported Costs

Quasi-experimental without control (n =0)

 Targeted (n =3)

Average Setting Sample Size

 Yes (n =1)

 Convenience and Targeted (n=1)

 102.67 (±173.50)

 No (n =3)

 Random and Targeted (n =0)

Average Setting Adoption Rate

Timing of Post-Program Assessment

 Not specified (n =0)

 50.50 %

 33.00 weeks (±26.20)

Physician Referral

 Not report (n =3)

 Moderation Analyses

Pre-post design (n =0)

 Yes (n =1)

 

 (n=0)

 No (n =3)