Table 1 Results of methodological quality assessment, AMSTAR criteria
Authors | Review on interventions or association | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al Sayah et al. [46] | Association | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | + | 7/11 |
Berkman et al. [38] | Association | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | – | – | + | 8/11 |
Carbone et al. [47] | Interventions | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | 5/11 |
Fransen et al. [39] | Both | + | – | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | 6/11 |
Gellad et al. [40] | Association | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | + | – | 7/11 |
Keller et al. [41] | Association | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – | – | 8/11 |
Lee et al. [48] | Interventions | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | – | – | + | 8/11 |
Lewis [42] | Association | + | – | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | 5/11 |
Loke et al. [21] | Both | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | 9/11 |
Newman-Casey et al. [52] | Intervention | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | 8/11 |
Ostini and Kairuz [45] | Association | + | – | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | + | 5/11 |
Schaefer [51] | Interventions | + | – | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | 4/11 |
Van Scoyoc et al. [50] | Interventions | + | + | – | + | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | 5/11 |
Sheridan et al. [49] | Interventions | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | 10/11 |
Wawrzyniak et al. [44] | Association | + | – | + | – | + | – | – | – | – | – | + | 4/11 |
Weekes [43] | Association | + | – | + | + | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3/11 |
Zhang et al. [37] | Association | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – | + | – | + | 7/11 |