Skip to main content

Table 2 Retailer opinions associated with store noncompliance with POS provisions

From: Retailer opinions about and compliance with family smoking prevention and tobacco control act point of sale provisions: a survey of tobacco retailers

Constructs [AOR (95 % CI)] (n = 161)

Model 1 Barriers awareness and source

Model 2 Individual covariates

Model 3 Individual and store covariates

Model 4 Individual, store and neighborhood covariates

Model 5 Individual, store, neighborhood and county covariates

Model A (Owners/Managers n = 161)

Awareness of regulations

1.99 (.84, 4.75)

2.03 (.83, 4.97)

2.61 (1.14, 5.95)

2.74 (.95, 7.78)

2.07 (.65, 6.58)

Source of information

.19 (.03, 1.15)

.11 (.01, .88)

.06 (.01, .81)

.03 (.00, 1.32)

.03 (.00, 1.45)

Barriers

2.13 (1.31, 3.46)

2.42 (1.38, 4.25)

2.64 (1.49, 4.68)

4.62 (2.47, 8.64)

5.56 (2.24, 12.26)

Model B (Owners/Managers/Clerks n = 249)

POS support

.61 (.37, 1.00)

.56 (.34, .90)

.57 (.33, .99)

.59 (.35, .99)

.59 (.36, .97)

  1. General Estimating Equations (GEE) controlling for covariates: Model 2 individual (smoking status, respondent type); Model 3 store (store type, total amount of tobacco marketing material); Model 4 neighborhood (% African American residents, % Hispanic residents, % residents under family poverty, % residents with college degree); and Model 5 county
  2. Bold font indicates factors that are statistically significant at the p < .05 level
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us