Table. 5 Results of logistic regression models predicting visiting the DrinkWise website
From: Do consumers ‘Get the facts’? A survey of alcohol warning label recognition in Australia
OR (95 % CI) | p | |
|---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 1.00 | |
Female | 0.23 (0.08–0.63) | .004 |
Age | Wald χ2 p = .304 | |
18–24 | 1.00 | |
25–34 | 0.80 (0.27–2.38) | .682 |
35–45 | 0.46 (0.15–1.42) | .176 |
Education | ||
Less than tertiary | 1.00 | |
Tertiary or above | 1.27 (0.50–3.26) | .613 |
Binge drinking | 1.56 (1.07–2.78) | .022 |
Main alcoholic drink | Wald χ2 p = .004 | |
Beer | 1.00 | |
Wine | 10.25 (3.35–33.36) | <.001 |
Spirits | 6.23 (1.57–24.73) | .009 |
Pre-mix | 0.77 (0.08–7.87) | .827 |
Cider | 2.45 (0.16–38.05) | .520 |
Other | 2.78 (0.24–32.27) | .413 |
Drink directly from can or bottle | ||
Never/not often | 1.00 | |
At least sometimes | 3.50 (1.11–11.02) | .032 |
Support for health warning labels | ||
Neutral or opposed | 1.00 | |
Support/strongly support | 4.27 (1.09–16.80) | .038 |
Recognition of the ‘Get the facts’ logo | ||
No | 1.00 | |
Yes | 7.25 (2.50–21.01) | <.001 |