Skip to main content

Table. 4 Results of logistic regression models predicting awareness of alcohol warning labels

From: Do consumers ‘Get the facts’? A survey of alcohol warning label recognition in Australia

  It is safest not to drink while pregnanta Is your drinking harming yourself or others? Kids and alcohol don’t mix
  OR (95 % CI) p OR (95 % CI) p OR (95 % CI) p
Gender
Male 1.00   1.00   1.00  
Female 1.22 (0.78–1.90) .391 0.77 (0.44–1.34) .350 0.58 (0.29–1.16) .125
Age Wald χ2 p < .001   Wald χ2 p = .026   Wald χ2 p = .004  
18–24 1.00   1.00   1.00  
25–34 0.97 (0.56–1.64) .873 0.56 (0.29–1.11) .096 0.40 (0.19–0.84) .016
35–45 0.31 (0.18–0.54) <.001 0.41 (0.21–0.78) .007 0.29 (0.14–0.60) .001
Education
Less than tertiary 1.00   1.00   1.00  
Tertiary or above 0.95 (0.62–1.46) .818 1.57 (0.92–2.68) .095 1.97 (1.02–3.84) .045
Binge drinking 1.40 (1.13–1.72) .002 1.55 (1.20–2.00) .001 1.54 (1.15–2.05) .004
Main alcoholic drink Wald χ2 p = .204   Wald χ2 p = .250   Wald χ2 p = .069  
Beer 1.00   1.00   1.00  
Wine 1.23 (0.70–2.16) .472 1.72 (0.89–3.31) .108 2.51 (1.04–6.06) .041
Spirits 0.88 (0.48–1.61) .671 1.36 (0.65–2.85) .418 1.16 (0.42–3.20) .776
Pre-mix 0.48 (0.24–0.98) .045 0.63 (0.25–1.59) .325 0.81 (0.25–2.67) .740
Cider 0.82 (0.28–2.39) .718 1.41 (0.34–5.85) .640 1.38 (0.23–8.20) .725
Other 0.95 (0.30–2.97) .929 1.19 (0.31–4.56) .796 4.22 (1.22–14.68) .023
Drink directly from can or bottle
Never/not often 1.00   1.00   1.00  
At least sometimes 1.75 (1.10–2.77) .018 2.24 (1.21–4.13) .010 2.90 (0.93–3.88) .077
Support for health warning labels
Neutral or opposed 1.00   1.00   1.00  
Support/strongly support 2.48 (1.41–4.37) .002 2.53 (1.25–5.12) .010 2.65 (1.06–6.60) .037
  1. aAwareness of any of the three pregnancy warning labels
  2. Note. Data weighted by age, sex, and state of residence