Table. 3 Results of logistic regression models predicting recognition of the ‘Get the facts’ logo
From: Do consumers ‘Get the facts’? A survey of alcohol warning label recognition in Australia
OR (95 % CI) | p | |
|---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 1.00 | |
Female | 0.65 (0.40–1.07) | .090 |
Age | Wald χ2 p < .001 | |
18–24 | 1.00 | |
25–34 | 0.85 (0.47–1.56) | .610 |
35–45 | 0.35 (0.19–0.65) | .001 |
Education | ||
Less than tertiary | 1.00 | |
Tertiary or above | 0.94 (0.59–1.51) | .800 |
Binge drinking | 1.61 (1.29–2.00) | <.001 |
Main alcoholic drink | Wald χ2 p = .358 | |
Beer | 1.00 | |
Wine | 1.20 (0.65–2.22) | .551 |
Spirits | 0.68 (0.33–1.38) | .281 |
Pre-mix | 0.60 (0.28–1.29) | .191 |
Cider | 0.79 (0.21–2.92) | .726 |
Other | 1.56 (0.56–4.40) | .397 |
Drink directly from can or bottle | ||
Never/not often | 1.00 | |
At least sometimes | 1.75 (1.02–3.01) | .041 |
Support for health warning labels | ||
Neutral or opposed | 1.00 | |
Support/strongly support | 1.92 (1.05–3.53) | .034 |