Skip to main content

Table 1 Quantitative social cohesion variables

From: Competition is not necessarily a barrier to community mobilisation among sex workers: an intervention planning assessment from Zimbabwe

 

Hwange

Mutare

Victoria Falls

 

n

Un-weighted

Weighted % (95 % CI)

n

Un-weighted

Weighted % (95 % CI)

n

Un-weighted

Weighted % (95 % CI)

Total

237

  

370

  

229

  

Median age

 

31

  

30

  

27

 

Median years duration in sex work

 

4

  

5

  

3

 

Median age started sex work

 

24

  

24

  

23

 

% "good" or "very good"

         

In general, how would you describe your relationships with other sex workers in this area?

147

62.0 %

65.7 (56.3 - 73.9)

237

64.1 %

62 (55–68.7)

143

62.4 %

61.4 (53.1 - 69.6)

% "strongly agree" or "agree"

         

There a lot of competition between the women working here

189

79.7 %

78.0 (69.8 - 85.1)

338

91.4 %

92.8 (89.0 - 95.8)

166

72.5 %

70.5 (62.6 - 78.1)

Sex workers can work together to improve their condition

124*

93.9 %

94.6 (89.6 - 98.5)

313

84.6 %

85.4 (80.9 - 89.9)

130*

85.5 %

84.6 (74.5 - 93.6)

Sex workers support each other at work

117

49.4 %

51.2 (42.6 - 59.9)

331

89.5 %

87.9 (82.7 - 92.3)

117

51.1 %

55.2 (45.9 - 63.8)

My colleagues would help me if I refused to have sex with a client

113

47.7 %

54.0 (45.7 - 62.1)

292

78.9 %

79.8 (74.1 - 84.8)

97

42.4 %

43.5 (35.1 - 51.9)

My colleagues will help me if they see a client become aggressive or violent

215

90.7 %

88.9 (82.8 - 94.4)

359

97.0 %

96.9 (94.4 - 98.8)

218

95.2 %

95.0 (91.7 - 97.8)

I feel comfortable talking to other sex workers about work related issues

223

94.1 %

93.3 (89.3 - 97.2)

356

96.2 %

95.6 (92.0 - 98.3)

218

95.2 %

95.5 (92.3 - 98.2)

I feel comfortable talking to other sex workers about health topics

224

94.5 %

94.7 (91.2 - 98.1)

348

94.1 %

94.2 (91.3 - 96.7)

217

94.8 %

95.0 (91.8 - 97.8)

% " frequently" or "at least once a week" in the past month

         

How often have you spoken to another sex worker about work?

149

62.9 %

58.1 (49.7 – 67.0)

195

52.7 %

44.9 (38.3 - 51.9)

126

55.0 %

53.6 (44.1 - 62.7)

% "yes"

         

Did you ask another sex worker for help at work?

182

76.8 %

72.5 (63.7 - 80.4)

237

64.1 %

64.6 (58.5 - 70.5)

182

79.5 %

83.0 (75.1 - 90.3)

Did you provide help at work to another sex worker?

210

88.6 %

85.1 (77.7 - 91.4)

290

78.4 %

72.5 (65.6 –79.0)

202

88.2 %

88.6 (81.5 - 94.4)

  1. Proportions for each variable are shown as un-weighted percentages and as RDS-weighted percentages with bootstrapped confidence intervals. The RDS weighting does not permit missing data or small group sizes, therefore un-weighted and weighted percentages are shown with women who refused to answer or did not know the answer in the denominator. In Hwange and Victoria Falls there was a large proportion of missing data for the question, Sex workers can work together to improve their condition”, with 32 women saying “don’t know” in Hwange, and 22 in Victoria Falls, as well as 73 “non-responses” in Hwange, and 55 in Victoria falls. By contrast, there was a total of 6 missing data points in Mutare. Therefore, for Hwange and Victoria Falls the proportions for this question do not include missing data in the denominator – the numerators are marked with an asterisk (*) and the dominators are 132 and 152, respectively. For other variables the amount of missing data at any one site was low, with an average of 1 and maximum of 7 data points missing per site. Therefore, they did not have important effects on the estimated proportion