From: Assessing community readiness online: a concurrent validation study
Overall quality of interviews |
a. Questions well answered, relevant information gathered (n = 19) |
b. Most relevant information gathered, respondent may have been reluctant to answer some questions (n = 8) |
c. Not all information there, may not be able to score (n = 3) |
Completeness of information |
a. All information gathered without trouble (n = 19) |
b. Respondent was reluctant to give information on community climate and community knowledge of the issue (n = 7) |
c. Respondent was reluctant to give information on community knowledge of existing efforts, community climate and community knowledge of the issue (n = 2) |
d. Respondent was reluctant to give information on community climate (n = 2) |
Salient, interesting, illuminating or important notes |
a. No other salient, interesting, illuminating or important notes (n = 23) |
b. Respondent did not want to use the term childhood obesity, instead referred to physical activity and healthy eating habits of children in the suburb (n = 4) |
c. Low level of readiness in the suburb resulted in a shorter interview (n = 3) |