Skip to main content

Table 2 Krlev et al’s 12-point quality assessment framework

From: Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology to account for value for money of public health interventions: a systematic review

Dimension number

Dimension

Criterion

Description of criterion

I

Transparency about why SROI was chosen

1

Linked to context discussion?

II

Documentation of the analysis

2

Analysis well documented?

 

3

Impact map used?

III

Study design (approximation of ‘dead-weight’)

4

Control group setup applied?

 

5

Ex ante - ex post observations performed?

IV

Precision of the analysis

6

Indicators valid & comprehensive?

 

7

Proxies valid & comprehensive?

 

8

Social effects captured? (Qualitatively)

 

9

Social effects captured? (Quantitatively)

V

Reflection of the results

10

Limitations discussed?

 

11

SROI ratio interpreted?

 

12

Sensitivity analysis performed?