Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of families enrolled (Intervention group) versus families eligible for program but not enrolled (Comparison group) prior-to and after weightinga (nā€‰=ā€‰4562 in Families First program; nā€‰=ā€‰5184 not in Families First program)

From: Can opportunities be enhanced for vaccinating children in home visiting programs? A population-based cohort study

Ā 

Un-weighted

Average treatment effect (ATE)

In Families First

Not in Families First

In Families First

Not in Families First

Alcohol and/or drug use (%)

37.96

38.80

38.32

38.31

Antisocial father (%)

4.98

4.22

4.77

4.76

Antisocial mother (%)

2.19

1.80

1.95

1.93

Child abuse mom (%)

26.40

18.61

22.20

22.30

Depression and/or anxiety mother (%)

36.23

31.57

34.20

34.06

Family history of disability (%)

5.34

4.69

4.98

4.94

Social isolation (%)

16.50

9.46

12.81

12.89

Maternal low education (%)

52.18

53.17

53.13

52.95

Mental disability mother (%)

1.69

1.00

1.34

1.43

No prenatal care before 6Ā months (%)

6.78

9.73

8.38

8.36

Prenatal screening (%)

17.49

7.72

12.28

12.29

Relationship distress (%)

26.00

19.03

22.51

22.51

Schizophrenia mother (%)

1.65

1.55

1.65

1.64

Single parent family (%)

42.55

47.73

45.64

45.36

Smoking during pregnancy (%)

49.79

56.01

52.86

52.86

Social assistance (%)

66.44

69.07

67.65

67.69

Maternal substance abuse (%)

3.30

2.73

3.00

2.95

Violence between parents (%)

9.50

8.13

8.72

8.82

Motherā€™s age at first birth (mean)

21.09

20.75

20.94

20.94

Parent survey scores (mean)

38.45

36.66

37.38

37.35

Socioeconomic factor index II (mean)

0.53

0.73

0.63

0.63

  1. aWeighting refers to the use of inverse-probability-of-treatment weights to adjust for potential confounders