Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analyses for the difference in HbA1c with peer support compared with usual care group

From: Effectiveness of peer support for improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Study characteristics

No. of studies

Mean difference of HbA1c, % (95% CI)

Heterogeneity

P

I2(%)

All studies

13

−0.57(−0.78 to −0.36)

<0.0001

80.0

Publication year

    

Before 2010

6

−0.47(−0.76 to −0.17)

<0.0001

82.0

After 2011

7

−0.68-1.05 to −0.31)

<0.0001

79.0

Study location

    

Medical institution

8

−0.71(−1.05 to −0.37)

<0.0001

77.0

Community or church

5

−0.41(−0.71 to −0.10)

<0.0001

84.0

HbA1c level at baseline*

    

≥ 8.5%

5

−0.78(−1.06 to −0.51)

0.94

0.0

7.5% to 8.5%

5

−0.76(−1.05 to −0.47)

0.003

75.0

<7.5%

3

−0.08(−0.32 to 0.16)

0.09

59.0

Mode of peer support

    

Peer coach

10

−0.51(−0.75 to −0.27)

<0.0001

84.0

Community health worker

3

−0.82(−1.15 to −0.49)

0.92

0.0

Type of peer support *

    

Individual

4

−0.91(−1.10 to −0.71)

0.81

0.0

Group

7

−0.42(−0.72 to −0.11)

0.0006

74.0

Both

2

−0.52(−0.66 to −0.38)

0.30

8.0

Frequency of contact

    

High

6

−0.52(−0.60 to −0.44)

0.68

0.0

Moderate

3

−0.75(−1.21 to −0.29)

0.009

79.0

Low

4

−0.32(−0.74 to 0.09)

0.002

80.0

Length of intervention

    

≦6 months

8

−0.64(−1.01 to −0.27)

<0.0001

85.0

>6 months

5

−0.51(−0.81to 0.20)

0.004

74.0

  1. Note: CI = confidence interval; *p <0.05 (subgroup difference).