Table 5 Opinions of the women’s group chairs on acceptability of the intervention (N = 10)

1. Child injury prevention is an important issue to consider for children’s health and development

-

-

-

10 (100%)

-

2. Before this programme, I knew that injuries to children are preventable

-

-

1 (10%)

9 (90%)

-

3. I think there is a need for such an intervention in the community

-

-

-

4 (40%)

6 (60%)

4. The intervention helped me learn about child injury prevention

-

-

-

8 (80%)

2 (20%)

5. I think other parents/carers will also find this intervention useful

-

-

-

10 (100%)

-

6. The total duration of the intervention i.e. monthly sessions for 6 months is appropriate

-

3 (30%)

-

6 (60%)

1 (10)

7. The duration is too long

-

-

-

-

-

8. The duration is too short

-

-

-

3 (30%)

-

9. The duration of the sessions for about 2 hours is appropriate

-

-

-

10 (100%)

-

10. The duration of sessions is too short

-

-

-

-

-

11. The duration of the sessions is too long

-

-

-

-

-

12. The duration between the sessions i.e. one month is appropriate

-

-

-

10 (100%)

-

13. The monthly interval is too long

-

-

-

-

-

14. The monthly interval is too short

-

-

-

-

-

15. I think such meetings with FCHVs are useful to prevent child injuries in the community

-

-

-

9 (90%)

1 (10%)

16. I will be able to do the activities suggested by FCHVs/this Programme for the safety of my child

-

-

-

8 (80%)

2 (20%)

17. Women’s group can lead to organise more sessions of child injury prevention themselves

-

-

-

9 (90%)

1 (10%)

18. I don’t think I will have enough time to attend the meeting**

-

-

2 (20%)

4 (40%)

4 (40%)

19. My family will support such an intervention

-

-

-

10 (100%)

-

20. I will be able to communicate these concepts with parents I see

-

-

-

8 (80%)

2 (20%)