Table 3 Opinions of the FCHVs on acceptability of the intervention (N = 9)

1. Child injury prevention is an important issue to consider for children’s health and development

-

-

-

9 (100%)

-

2. Before this programme, I knew that injuries to children are preventable

-

-

2 (22.2%)

7 (77.8%)

-

3. I think there is a need for such an intervention in the community

-

-

-

5 (55.6%)

4 (44.4%)

4. The intervention helped me learn about child injury prevention

-

-

-

6 (66.7%)

3 (33.3%)

5. I think other parents/carers will also find this intervention useful

-

-

1 (11.1%)

8 (88.9%)

-

6. The total duration of the intervention i.e. monthly sessions for 6 months is appropriate

-

4 (44.4%)

-

5 (55.6%)

-

7. The duration is too long

-

-

-

-

-

8. The duration is too short

-

-

-

4 (44.4%)

-

9. The duration of the sessions for about 2 hours is appropriate

-

1 (11.1%)

-

8 (88.9%)

-

10. The duration of sessions is too short

-

-

-

-

-

11. The duration of the sessions is too long

-

-

-

1 (11.1%)

-

12. The duration between the sessions i.e. one month is appropriate

-

-

-

9 (100%)

-

13. The monthly interval is too long

-

-

-

-

-

14. The monthly interval is too short

-

-

-

-

-

15. The session facilitation manual appropriately covers the issues related to child injury prevention

-

-

-

8 (88.9%)

1 (11.1%)

16. Layout and the design of the manual are appropriate

-

-

-

8 (88.9%)

1 (11.1%)

17. Participation of the Mothers in the meeting is appropriate

-

-

-

9 (100%)

-

18. Women’s group can lead to organise more sessions of child injury prevention themselves

-

-

1 (11.1%)

8 (88.9%)

-

19. I will be able to communicate these concepts with parents I see

-

-

-

4 (44.4%)

5 (55.6%)

20. The intervention is relevant to my everyday work

-

-

-

8 (88.9%)

1 (11.1%)