Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of quality assessment for cohort studies

From: Relationship between alcohol-attributable disease and socioeconomic status, and the role of alcohol consumption in this relationship: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study, Year

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

QA

1

2

3

4

5a

5b

6

7

8

Score

Braaten et al., 2005 [22]

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

7

Brummett et al., 2011 [38]

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

5

Chaix et al., 2010 [39]

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

â‹…â‹…â‹…

6

Dyer et al., 1999 [40]

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

8

Heck & Palmuck, 2007 [23]

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

8

Joshi et al., 2008 [30]

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

*

*

7

Kivimaki et al., 2009 [32]

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

7

Kuper et al., 2007 [33]

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

*

*

8

Laaksonen et al., 2007 [34]

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

*

7

Larsen et al., 2011 [26]

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

7

McFadden et al., 2009 [35]

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

9

Melchior et al., 2005 [28]

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

6

Sundell et al., 2008 [36]

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

*

*

*

*

*

*

8

Veronesi et al., 2010 [37]

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

â‹…â‹…â‹…

8

  1. *, criteria met. ⋅⋅⋅, criteria not met. Criteria: 1, Representative of average adult in the community. 2, Drawn from same community as exposed cohort. 3, Secure record or structured interview. 4, Demonstrated. 5a = Yes (age, sex, alcohol & SES). 5b = Yes (additional e.g. lifestyle factors). 6 = Independent blind assessment, record linkage. 7 = Follow-up > 6 months. 8 = Complete follow-up, or number lost <20%.