From: Establishing a proactive safety and health risk management system in the fire service
Recommendations | Considerations and suggestions |
---|---|
1. Planning or organizing for the scoping sessions | - Involve a diverse group of firefighters across rank and experience |
- Think about how to get people to participate (pay overtime vs. take out of service during one’s shift) | |
- Utilize best practices for effective participatory engagement that bolsters the “bottom up” approach | |
- Choose a strong facilitator to lead the scoping sessions | |
- Recognize that not everyone will show up for every session | |
2. Identify clear tasks for the RM process | - Select task with definable steps to facilitate mapping process |
- Have clear tasks to help identify specific control strategies | |
3. Utilize quality data | - Use department level data (and station level if possible) |
- Present data clearly and by task | |
4. Understand culture | - Consider elements of firefighter culture. Utilizing a “bottom up” approach does not always lead to buy-in from firefighters in the field (beyond supervisors) not involved in the process. |
- Some FF may not support the RM process because it is not “how they always do it” | |
5. Recognize the importance of technical assistance (TA) | - Ensure technical assistance in compiling data for the RM process |
- Provide technical assistance for other aspects of the RM process, such as the mapping and ranking of control strategies | |
6. Understand available resources | - Firefighters will not buy-in if they feel that the administration is not willing to invest resources |
- Highlight the cost savings of RM to support financial investment in control strategies | |
7. Provide regular communication | - Communicate expectations of the RM process upfront, including resources available for control strategies |
- Provide regular communication to all firefighters since those not involved in RM may not be aware of all of the activities |