Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalences of WHP configurations, by subgroups of the sample

From: Patterns and predictors of workplace health promotion: cross-sectional findings from a company survey in Germany

Variable

Level D

Level C

Level B

Level A

 

% (w)

95% CI

% (w)

95% CI

% (w)

95% CI

% (w)

95% CI

Number of employees

        

1–9

51

(48–55)

27

(24–30)

14

(12–17)

8

(6–10)

10–49

30

(27–34)

36

(32–39)

25

(22–28)

10

(8–12)

50–249

11

(9–14)

29

(26–32)

37

(33–40)

23

(20–26)

≥250

3

(2–4)

13

(10–15)

32

(28–36)

53

(49–57)

Sector (I)

        

Private

46

(44–49)

29

(26–31)

17

(15–19)

8

(7–9)

Public

22

(26–29)

30

(24–38)

25

(19–32)

23

(17–31)

Sector (II)

        

Services

45

(42–48)

27

(24–29)

18

(16–20)

10

(9–12)

Production/agriculture

41

(36–45)

35

(31–40)

18

(15–22)

6

(5–8)

Economic situation

        

Bad

52

(43–61)

25

(18–32)

15

(10–23)

8

(4–16)

Satisfactory

47

(43–51)

29

(25–33)

16

(14–20)

8

(6–10)

Good

41

(38–45)

29

(26–32)

20

(17–22)

11

(9–13)

Works council a

        

Not yes

42

(39–46)

31

(28–34)

20

(17–22)

7

(6–9)

Yes

11

(8–15)

29

(24–34)

37

(31–42)

24

(20–28)

Safety specialist assistance

        

Not yes

60

(56–64)

26

(23–30)

9

(7–11)

5

(4–7)

Yes

33

(30–36)

31

(28–33)

24

(22–27)

12

(10–14)

Occupational health specialist assistance

        

Not yes

58

(54–62)

27

(24–31)

10

(8–12)

5

(4–7)

Yes

30

(26–33)

30

(27–33)

27

(24–30)

14

(12–16)

  1. N = 6,500; w = weighted; CI = confidence interval; aonly companies with ≥5 employees (N = 5,466).