Skip to main content

Table 4 Grocery pharmacy contraceptive sales negative binomial regression results by study group and time

From: Impact of a passive social marketing intervention in community pharmacies on oral contraceptive and condom sales: a quasi-experimental study

 

Estimate

SE

LB

UB

t

P value

Condom Sales

      

intervention (vs. comparison)

0.43

0.36

−0.28

1.14

1.21

0.228

time 2 (vs. 1)

−0.07

0.06

−0.19

0.05

−1.13

0.263

time 3 (vs. 1)

−0.62

0.06

−0.74

−0.50

−10.32

<0.001

time 3 (vs. 2)

−0.55

0.06

−0.67

−0.44

−9.19

<0.001

intervention * time 2 (vs. 1)

0.14

0.12

−0.10

0.38

1.15

0.253

intervention * time 3 (vs. 1)

0.19

0.12

−0.05

0.43

1.60

0.113

intervention * time 3 (vs. 2)

0.05

0.12

−0.19

0.29

0.45

0.652

Oral Contraceptive

intervention (vs. comparison)

−0.20

0.16

−0.52

0.11

−1.28

0.205

time 2 (vs. 1)

−0.07

0.02

−0.10

−0.03

−3.62

<0.001

time 3 (vs. 1)

−0.02

0.02

−0.06

0.02

−1.11

0.269

time 3 (vs. 2)

0.05

0.02

0.01

0.08

2.50

0.014

intervention * time 2 (vs. 1)

0.02

0.04

−0.06

0.09

0.42

0.675

intervention * time 3 (vs. 1)

−0.01

0.04

−0.08

0.06

−0.25

0.803

intervention * time 3 (vs. 2)

−0.02

0.04

−0.10

0.05

−0.67

0.504

  1. Main effect and interaction estimates and p values are computed with contrast tests in the regression.
  2. Interaction terms reference category is always control.
  3. LB = Lower Bound, UB = Upper Bound for a 95% Confidence Interval.