| Full sample(N)Unadjusted meanc | Analytic sample(N = 1060)Unadjusted meane | Analytic sample(N = 1060)Fully adjusted mean(95%CI)d | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Demographic factors | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Gender | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Male | 29.7 (1068) | 33.2 (550) | 33.1 | [31.9,34.3] |
Female | 31.9 (872)** | 35.6 (510)** | 35.5** | [34.2,36.8] |
Ethnic group | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†White: UK | 31.8 (378) | 34.1 (231) | 33.9 | [32.0,35.8] |
White: Mixed | 29.3 (232) | 34.1 (111) | 34.1 | [31.4,36.8] |
Asian: Indian | 31.7 (71) | 34.8 (49) | 34.5 | [30.5,38.5] |
Asian: Pakistani | 29.6 (87) | 34.1 (48) | 34.1 | [30.0,38.2] |
Asian: Bangladeshi | 31.2 (355) | 33.4 (233) | 33.6 | [31.5,35.6] |
Black: Caribbean | 32.5 (89) | 36.1 (39) | 35.9 | [31.4,40.4] |
Black: African | 31 (212) | 37.4 (91) | 37.2 | [34.3,40.2] |
Other | 29.8 (498) | 34.1 (258) | 34.0 | [32.2,35.8] |
Nativity | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†UK Born | 31.4 (1515) | 34.4 (878) | 34.5 | [33.5,35.5] |
Born overseas | 28.9 (386) | 34.2 (182) | 33.3 | [31.1,35.5] |
Borough | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Newham | 29.7 (567) | 35 (266) | 35.2 | [33.3,37.0] |
Tower Hamlets | 31.7 (530)* | 34.1 (315) | 34.3 | [32.6,36.1] |
Barking & Dagenham | 30.3 (410) | 33.9 (257) | 33.5 | [31.6,35.4] |
Hackney | 31.3 (433) | 34.3 (222) | 34.0 | [31.9,36.0] |
Socioeconomic factors | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Parental economic activity | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Both unemployed | 31.7 (195) | 34.8 (131) | 34.2 | [31.3,37.2] |
One parent employed | 29.8 (600) | 33.3 (361) | 33.2 | [31.6,34.7] |
Both parents employed | 31.6 (643) | 35 (412) | 35.2 | [33.6,36.8] |
Lone parent employed | 33.3 (137) | 33.7 (80) | 33.9 | [30.7,37.1] |
Lone parent unemployed | 32.9 (119) | 35.9 (70) | 35.0 | [31.4,38.6] |
Doesn’t live with parents | 26.4 (16) | 32.5 (6) | 32.2 | [20.8,43.7] |
Family affluence a | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Low | 31.1 (223) | 33.9 (132) | 33.7 | [31.2,36.2] |
Moderate | 31.4 (1001) | 34.6 (572) | 34.5 | [33.3,35.7] |
High | 30.4 (623) | 34 (356) | 34.1 | [32.5,35.6] |
Free school meals | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†No meals | 31.3 (1164) | 34 (700) | 33.9 | [32.7,35.1] |
Receives free meals | 30 (739) | 35 (360) | 35.0 | [33.2,36.8] |
Environmental Factors | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Neighbourhood safety b | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Safe | 32.8 (393) | 33.5 (282) | 33.4 | [31.7,35.2] |
Mixed | 35 (491)* | 35.3 (370) | 35.3 | [33.8,36.8] |
Not safe | 33 (587) | 34 (408) | 33.9 | [32.4,35.4] |
Neighbourhood aesthetics b | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Pleasant | 34.1 (343) | 34.2 (271) | 34.2 | [32.4,36.0] |
Mixed | 33.3 (437) | 34.7 (322) | 34.7 | [33.1,36.3] |
Unpleasant | 33.3 (671) | 34.1 (467) | 34.0 | [32.6,35.4] |
Neighbourhood walk-cycleabilityb | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Easy to walk/cycle | 31.8 (277) | 32.9 (218) | 32.8 | [30.9,34.7] |
Mixed | 34.4 (397)* | 35 (310) | 34.7 | [33.1,36.4] |
Not easy to walk/cycle | 34 (687)* | 34.6 (532) | 34.6 | [33.3,35.8] |
Proximity to businesses & services b | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Close by | 32.9 (367) | 33.7 (286) | 33.7 | [32.0,35.4] |
Mixed | 33.6 (522) | 34.3 (367) | 34.0 | [32.6,35.5] |
Far away | 33.7 (567) | 34.8 (407) | 34.9 | [33.4,36.3] |
Likelihood ratio test v linear regression |  |  | p = <0.001 |  |