| Full sample(N)Unadjusted meanc | Analytic sample(N = 1689)Unadjusted mean | Analytic sample(N = 1689)Fully adjusted mean(95%CI)d | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Demographic factors | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Gender | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Male | 51.6 (1692) | 52.3 (898) | 52.3 | [51.7,52.9] |
Female | 50.5 (1293)*** | 50.8 (791)*** | 50.8*** | [50.2,51.4] |
Ethnic group | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†White: UK | 51.0 (579) | 51.4 (352) | 51.3 | [50.4,52.3] |
White: Mixed | 50.9 (362) | 51.3 (183) | 51.4 | [50.1,52.6] |
Asian: Indian | 51.6 (106) | 52.6 (71) | 52.5 | [50.5,54.5] |
Asian: Pakistani | 49.8 (125) | 49.9 (78) | 50.4 | [48.5,52.4] |
Asian: Bangladeshi | 50.9 (500) | 51.5 (335) | 51.3 | [50.3,52.3] |
Black: Caribbean | 52.6 (138) | 52.6 (65) | 52.7 | [50.6,54.8] |
Black: African | 52.0 (342) | 51.8 (172) | 51.7 | [50.4,53.0] |
Other | 51.1 (803) | 51.9 (433) | 52.0 | [51.1,52.8] |
Nativity | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†UK Born | 51.1 (2344) | 51.6 (1376) | 51.6 | [51.2,52.1] |
Born overseas | 51.3 (595) | 51.6 (313) | 51.5 | [50.5,52.5] |
Borough | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Newham | 50.3 (856) | 50.7 (421) | 50.8 | [50.0,51.6] |
Tower Hamlets | 51.7 (790)** | 51.9 (476)* | 51.9 | [51.1,52.7] |
Barking & Dagenham | 51.7 (641)** | 52.1 (414)* | 52.5* | [51.6,53.3] |
Hackney | 51.1 (698) | 51.5 (378) | 51.1 | [50.2,52.0] |
Socioeconomic factors | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Parental economic activity | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Both unemployed | 50.7 (273) | 50.8 (185) | 51.0 | [49.6,52.4] |
One parent employed | 51.1 (920) | 51.7 (580) | 51.9 | [51.2,52.6] |
Both parents employed | 51.7 (1020) | 51.9 (665) | 51.5 | [50.7,52.2] |
Lone parent employed | 50.4 (229) | 50.6 (144) | 50.7 | [49.3,52.2] |
Lone parent unemployed | 52.0 (171) | 52.3 (100) | 53.2* | [51.5,55.0] |
Doesn’t live with parents | 47.6 (28) | 49.3 (15) | 49.5 | [45.0,54.0] |
Family affluence a | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Low | 50.2 (302) | 50.1 (179) | 50.0 | [48.8,51.3] |
Moderate | 50.8 (1527) | 51.3 (906) | 51.3* | [50.8,51.9] |
High | 51.9 (1034)** | 52.5 (604)* | 52.5** | [51.8,53.2] |
Free school meals | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†No meals | 51.3 (1758) | 51.7 (1100) | 51.6 | [51.0,52.1] |
Receives free meals | 50.8 (1173) | 51.4 (589) | 51.6 | [50.8,52.4] |
Environmental factors | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Neighbourhood safety b | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Safe | 52.8 (619) | 53.3 (456) | 52.4 | [51.6,53.2] |
Mixed | 51.7 (762)* | 51.8 (573) * | 51.7 | [51.0,52.4] |
Not safe | 50.0 (942) *** | 50.3 (660) *** | 50.9* | [50.2,51.6] |
Neighbourhood aesthetics b | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Pleasant | 53.8 (554) | 53.8 (439) | 53.6 | [52.7,54.4] |
Mixed | 51.7 (676)*** | 52.0 (508)*** | 51.9** | [51.2,52.7] |
Unpleasant | 49.8 (1050)*** | 50.0 (742)*** | 50.2** | [49.5,50.8] |
Neighbourhood walk-cycleabilityb | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Easy to walk/cycle | 52.8 (478) | 53.1 (367) | 53.2 | [52.3,54.1] |
Mixed | 50.8 (616)*** | 51.0 (487)*** | 51.2** | [50.5,52.0] |
Not easy to walk/cycle | 51.3 (1067)*** | 51.3 (835)** | 51.1** | [50.5,51.7] |
Proximity to businesses & services b | Â | Â | Â | Â |
†Close by | 52.8 (626) | 53.0 (480) | 52.7 | [52.0,53.5] |
Mixed | 51.6 (809)* | 51.9 (581)* | 52.0 | [51.3,52.7] |
Far away | 50.4 (890)*** | 50.2 (628)*** | 50.3** | [49.7,51.0] |
Likelihood ratio test v linear regression |  |  | p = 1.00 |  |