Table 4 Implementation of A pleasant eating environment : assessed at the individual-, school- and class level
Process evaluation concept | Source and timing of data collection | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Teacher midway survey | Teacher follow-up survey | Pupil follow-up survey | |||||
Individual level average implementation level (A) | No of schools ≥80% implementation/out of all responding schools | Individual level average implementation level (A) | No of schools ≥80% implementation/out of all responding schools | Individual level average implementation level (A) | No of schools ≥80% implementation/out of all responding schools | No of classes ≥80% implementation/out of all classes | |
Fidelity/Dose delivered | |||||||
FV are cut up in the teachers' lessons (every time/most times) | 49% (0-100%) | 6/19 | 55% (0-100%) | 8/19 | |||
Boost coordinators | 47% | 47% | |||||
Other teachers | 50% | 58% | |||||
How often the Boost FV were cut up | 60% (A: 28-91%, B: 11-100%) | 5/20 | 15/55 | ||||
FV are usually cut up by: | |||||||
Each pupil | 11% (0-100%) | ||||||
Designated FV hosts | 52% (0-100%) | ||||||
Other pupils | 19% (0-67%) | ||||||
Teachers | 18% (0-100%) | ||||||
Dose received | |||||||
Time is allocated for the pupils to eat FV in class | 68% (A: 40-93%, B: 24-100% ) | 5/20 | 21/55 | ||||
The pupils are having a good time while eating Boost FV together | 83% (0-100%) | 14/20 | 54% (A: 35-72%, B: 21-90%) | 0/20 | 7/55 | ||
Reach of intervention among subgroups | |||||||
The pupils are having a good time while eating Boost FV together | |||||||
High SEP | 55% | ||||||
Medium SEP | 50% | ||||||
Low SEP | 63% (P = 0.0212) | ||||||
Girls | 59% | ||||||
Boys | 50% (P = 0.0054) | ||||||